Comparison

Overview

Company snapshot and where each provider is based.

FieldCM.comMitto
What it isA conversational commerce and customer engagement platform offering business messaging across SMS, RCS, WhatsApp and other channels, plus voice, email and payments, via API and cloud apps.Swiss omnichannel CPaaS provider offering SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Telegram, Facebook Messenger and voice messaging APIs for business communications.
Founded19992013
Ownershippublicprivate
Employees500-1,000100-250
HQ cityBredaZug
HQ countryNetherlands (EU)Switzerland
What's the differenceCM.com edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (58 vs 48). CM.com is public and headquartered in Breda, Netherlands (EU); Mitto is private and based in Zug, Switzerland.

Channels

Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.

FieldCM.comMitto
SMSYesYes
MMSNoNo
RCSYesYes
WhatsAppYesYes
ViberYesYes
Facebook MessengerYesYes
TelegramYesYes
Apple Messages for BusinessYesNo
VoiceYesYes
EmailYesNo
What's the differenceThey share 7 channels. CM.com additionally offers Apple Messages for Business, Email.

Developer Experience

How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.

FieldCM.comMitto
Self-service onboardingYesYes
Free developer creditNoNo
Docs qualityhighmed
DocumentationOpen ↗Open ↗
SDKsPHP, Java, Python, .NET, Node.js
Sandbox / test envYesYes
API typesREST, SMPPREST, SMPP
What's the differenceOn SDKs, CM.com adds PHP, Java, Python, .NET, Node.js.

Data & Compliance

Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.

FieldCM.comMitto
EU data residencyYesNo
US data residencyNoNo
Choose regionNoNo
GDPRYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2NoNo
HIPAANoNo
What's the differenceCM.com offers EU data residency, while Mitto does not.

Data Retention

How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.

FieldCM.comMitto
Retention policyNot publicly documented in detail. CM.com states it hosts data in Europe and holds ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701 certifications; message content and metadata retention are governed by its privacy statement and per-customer data processing agreements rather than a single published fixed retention period.Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.
What's the differenceCM.com: Not publicly documented in detail. CM.com states it hosts data in Europe and holds ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701 certifications; message content and metadata retention are governed by its privacy statement and per-customer data processing agreements rather than a single published fixed retention period. Mitto: Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.

Pricing & Credits

Pricing model and the cost of a first message.

FieldCM.comMitto
Pricing modelPay-per-use (pay-as-you-go) charged per message with one fixed price per destination country, volume discounts above ~50,000 messages/month, and optional subscription tiers.Pay-as-you-go — pay only for what you use with no contracts, plus volume discounts and custom plans via sales.
SMS starting priceNot published (per-country pay-per-use pricing requires selecting a region on the pricing page)Not published
Free developer creditNoNo
What's the differenceCM.com and Mitto are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.

Reach & Reliability

Global coverage and delivery dependability.

FieldCM.comMitto
Countries covered0230
Direct operator connectionsYesYes
Published uptime SLANo published SLANo published SLA
What's the differenceMitto leads on Countries covered (230 vs 0 for CM.com).

Company & Trust

Independent reviews and company profile.

FieldCM.comMitto
G2 rating4.84.0
G2 reviews122
Ownershippublicprivate
Employees500-1,000100-250
What's the differenceCM.com leads on G2 rating (4.8 vs 4 for Mitto); CM.com leads on G2 reviews (12 vs 2 for Mitto).

Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides: