Comparison
Overview
Company snapshot and where each provider is based.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Greek business-messaging platform for SMS, Viber, WhatsApp, RCS, Messenger and email campaigns, with a web platform plus REST and SMPP APIs. | Swiss omnichannel CPaaS provider offering SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Telegram, Facebook Messenger and voice messaging APIs for business communications. |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 51-200 | 100-250 |
| HQ city | Thessaloniki | Zug |
| HQ country | Greece (EU) | Switzerland |
What's the differenceApifon edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (52 vs 48). Apifon is private and headquartered in Thessaloniki, Greece (EU); Mitto is private and based in Zug, Switzerland.
Channels
Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| SMS | Yes | Yes |
| MMS | No | No |
| RCS | Yes | Yes |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Viber | Yes | Yes |
| Facebook Messenger | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | No | Yes |
| Apple Messages for Business | No | No |
| Voice | No | Yes |
| Yes | No |
What's the differenceThey share 5 channels. Apifon additionally offers Email, while Mitto additionally offers Telegram, Voice.
Developer Experience
How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service onboarding | Yes | Yes |
| Free developer credit | Free trial bonus on verification | No |
| Docs quality | high | med |
| Documentation | Open ↗ | Open ↗ |
| SDKs | Java, PHP, C#, Python, Node.js | — |
| Sandbox / test env | No | Yes |
| API types | REST, SMPP | REST, SMPP |
What's the differenceOn SDKs, Apifon adds Java, PHP, C#, Python, Node.js; Mitto offers Sandbox / test env, while Apifon does not.
Data & Compliance
Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| EU data residency | Yes | No |
| US data residency | No | No |
| Choose region | No | No |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | No |
| HIPAA | No | No |
What's the differenceApifon offers EU data residency, while Mitto does not.
Data Retention
How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Retention policy | Message logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union. | Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends. |
What's the differenceApifon: Message logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union. Mitto: Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.
Pricing & Credits
Pricing model and the cost of a first message.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Prepaid pay-as-you-go: customers top up a euro balance by card, PayPal, or bank transfer and messages are charged against it; per-message rates are quoted per account, not published. | Pay-as-you-go — pay only for what you use with no contracts, plus volume discounts and custom plans via sales. |
| SMS starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free developer credit | Free trial bonus on verification | No |
What's the differenceApifon and Mitto are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.
Reach & Reliability
Global coverage and delivery dependability.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Countries covered | 200 | 230 |
| Direct operator connections | No | Yes |
| Published uptime SLA | No published SLA | No published SLA |
What's the differenceMitto leads on Countries covered (230 vs 200 for Apifon); Mitto offers Direct operator connections, while Apifon does not.
Company & Trust
Independent reviews and company profile.
| Field | Apifon | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| G2 rating | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| G2 reviews | 3 | 2 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 51-200 | 100-250 |
What's the differenceApifon leads on G2 rating (4.8 vs 4 for Mitto); Apifon leads on G2 reviews (3 vs 2 for Mitto).
Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides: