Comparison

Overview

Company snapshot and where each provider is based.

FieldApifonBird
What it isGreek business-messaging platform for SMS, Viber, WhatsApp, RCS, Messenger and email campaigns, with a web platform plus REST and SMPP APIs.Communications infrastructure platform (formerly MessageBird) providing unified APIs for email, SMS, WhatsApp and voice on a network that carries about 40% of the world's commercial SMS volume.
Founded20142011
Ownershipprivateprivate
Employees51-200500-1,000
HQ cityThessalonikiAmsterdam
HQ countryGreece (EU)Netherlands (EU)
What's the differenceBird edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (76 vs 52). Apifon is private and headquartered in Thessaloniki, Greece (EU); Bird is private and based in Amsterdam, Netherlands (EU).

Channels

Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.

FieldApifonBird
SMSYesYes
MMSNoNo
RCSYesNo
WhatsAppYesYes
ViberYesNo
Facebook MessengerYesNo
TelegramNoNo
Apple Messages for BusinessNoNo
VoiceNoYes
EmailYesYes
What's the differenceThey share 3 channels. Apifon additionally offers RCS, Viber, Facebook Messenger, while Bird additionally offers Voice.

Developer Experience

How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.

FieldApifonBird
Self-service onboardingYesYes
Free developer creditFree trial bonus on verificationFree email tier (1,000/month)
Docs qualityhighhigh
DocumentationOpen ↗Open ↗
SDKsJava, PHP, C#, Python, Node.jsTypeScript, Python, Go
Sandbox / test envNoYes
API typesREST, SMPPREST, SMTP
What's the differenceOn SDKs, Apifon adds Java, PHP, C#, Node.js; Bird adds TypeScript, Go; Bird offers Sandbox / test env, while Apifon does not; on API types, Apifon adds SMPP; Bird adds SMTP.

Data & Compliance

Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.

FieldApifonBird
EU data residencyYesYes
US data residencyNoYes
Choose regionNoYes
GDPRYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2NoYes
HIPAANoYes
What's the differenceBird offers US data residency, while Apifon does not; Bird offers Choose region, while Apifon does not; Bird offers SOC 2, while Apifon does not; Bird offers HIPAA, while Apifon does not.

Data Retention

How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.

FieldApifonBird
Retention policyMessage logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union.Privacy statement: for telecom products (SMS, email, voice), metadata and traffic data are retained for 6 months after transmission, extended up to two years where local law requires; email message content is held for at most 72 hours.
What's the differenceApifon: Message logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union. Bird: Privacy statement: for telecom products (SMS, email, voice), metadata and traffic data are retained for 6 months after transmission, extended up to two years where local law requires; email message content is held for at most 72 hours.

Pricing & Credits

Pricing model and the cost of a first message.

FieldApifonBird
Pricing modelPrepaid pay-as-you-go: customers top up a euro balance by card, PayPal, or bank transfer and messages are charged against it; per-message rates are quoted per account, not published.Usage-based transactional pricing with no platform or seat fees: volume-tiered email subscriptions (free tier, then e.g. $15/month for 50K emails) and published per-country per-message SMS rates; WhatsApp priced by destination country and message category.
SMS starting priceNot published$0.0073 per message to US numbers (long code, toll-free and short code; carrier fees extra), per-country pricing grid published
Free developer creditFree trial bonus on verificationFree email tier (1,000/month)
What's the differenceApifon and Bird are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.

Reach & Reliability

Global coverage and delivery dependability.

FieldApifonBird
Countries covered200150
Direct operator connectionsNoYes
Published uptime SLANo published SLA99.95% (legacy MessageBird SLA; current SLAs are per-service-plan in Order Form terms)
What's the differenceApifon leads on Countries covered (200 vs 150 for Bird); Bird offers Direct operator connections, while Apifon does not.

Company & Trust

Independent reviews and company profile.

FieldApifonBird
G2 rating4.83.9
G2 reviews373
Ownershipprivateprivate
Employees51-200500-1,000
What's the differenceApifon leads on G2 rating (4.8 vs 3.9 for Bird); Bird leads on G2 reviews (73 vs 3 for Apifon).

Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides:

Already on one of them? Follow a migration guide: