Comparison
Overview
Company snapshot and where each provider is based.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | European communications-platform-as-a-service (CPaaS) provider offering SMS, MMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, voice, and email messaging through REST, SMPP, and SOAP APIs. | Telnyx is a licensed telecom carrier offering a CPaaS platform with APIs for SMS, MMS, RCS, WhatsApp, voice, and email over its own private global IP network. |
| Founded | 2001 | 2009 |
| Ownership | public | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 201-500 |
| HQ city | Oslo | Chicago |
| HQ country | Norway | USA |
What's the differenceTelnyx edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (78 vs 36). LINK Mobility is public and headquartered in Oslo, Norway; Telnyx is private and based in Chicago, USA.
Channels
Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| SMS | Yes | Yes |
| MMS | Yes | Yes |
| RCS | Yes | Yes |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Viber | Yes | No |
| Facebook Messenger | Yes | No |
| Telegram | Yes | No |
| Apple Messages for Business | No | No |
| Voice | Yes | Yes |
| Yes | Yes |
What's the differenceThey share 6 channels. LINK Mobility additionally offers Viber, Facebook Messenger, Telegram.
Developer Experience
How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service onboarding | No | Yes |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
| Docs quality | med | high |
| Documentation | Open ↗ | Open ↗ |
| SDKs | — | Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, Java, .NET, PHP |
| Sandbox / test env | No | No |
| API types | REST, SMPP, SOAP | REST, SMPP |
What's the differenceTelnyx offers Self-service onboarding, while LINK Mobility does not; on SDKs, Telnyx adds Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, Java, .NET, PHP; on API types, LINK Mobility adds SOAP.
Data & Compliance
Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| EU data residency | Yes | Yes |
| US data residency | No | Yes |
| Choose region | No | Yes |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | Yes |
| HIPAA | No | Yes |
What's the differenceTelnyx offers US data residency, while LINK Mobility does not; Telnyx offers Choose region, while LINK Mobility does not; Telnyx offers SOC 2, while LINK Mobility does not; Telnyx offers HIPAA, while LINK Mobility does not.
Data Retention
How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Retention policy | Not publicly documented in detail. LINK Mobility processes personal data under GDPR as a data processor and states in its GDPR documentation that it operates an integrated ISO 27001 information-security management system (ISMS) with the goal of meeting the requirements of the ISAE 3000 report; message content and metadata retention periods are governed by customer contracts/data-processing agreements rather than a published fixed retention window. | Telnyx follows a "Privacy by Design", minimal data-retention approach with customer-controlled retention policies, so message content and metadata retention can be configured by the customer. Its security-practices documentation states security logs are retained for 90 days; specific default retention periods for message content are not publicly documented in detail. |
What's the differenceLINK Mobility: Not publicly documented in detail. LINK Mobility processes personal data under GDPR as a data processor and states in its GDPR documentation that it operates an integrated ISO 27001 information-security management system (ISMS) with the goal of meeting the requirements of the ISAE 3000 report; message content and metadata retention periods are governed by customer contracts/data-processing agreements rather than a published fixed retention window. Telnyx: Telnyx follows a "Privacy by Design", minimal data-retention approach with customer-controlled retention policies, so message content and metadata retention can be configured by the customer. Its security-practices documentation states security logs are retained for 90 days; specific default retention periods for message content are not publicly documented in detail.
Pricing & Credits
Pricing model and the cost of a first message.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Volume-based, pay-as-you-go enterprise pricing negotiated through sales; per-message rates are not published on the main platform. | Pay-as-you-go per message billed per message part, with volume discounts and custom contracts for high-volume customers. |
| SMS starting price | Not published | $0.004 per outbound SMS message part (US, plus carrier fees) |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
What's the differenceLINK Mobility and Telnyx are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.
Reach & Reliability
Global coverage and delivery dependability.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Countries covered | 0 | 130 |
| Direct operator connections | Yes | Yes |
| Published uptime SLA | No published SLA | 99.99% (SLA) |
What's the differenceTelnyx leads on Countries covered (130 vs 0 for LINK Mobility).
Company & Trust
Independent reviews and company profile.
| Field | LINK Mobility | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| G2 rating | 0.0 | 4.7 |
| G2 reviews | 0 | 525 |
| Ownership | public | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 201-500 |
What's the differenceTelnyx leads on G2 rating (4.7 vs 0 for LINK Mobility); Telnyx leads on G2 reviews (525 vs 0 for LINK Mobility).
Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides:
Already on one of them? Follow a migration guide: