Comparison
Overview
Company snapshot and where each provider is based.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise CPaaS and A2P messaging provider offering SMS, WhatsApp, Viber, RCS and email through a single API, plus messaging-hub and SMS-firewall services for mobile network operators. | Telnyx is a licensed telecom carrier offering a CPaaS platform with APIs for SMS, MMS, RCS, WhatsApp, voice, and email over its own private global IP network. |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 201-500 |
| HQ city | Baar | Chicago |
| HQ country | Switzerland | USA |
What's the differenceTelnyx edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (78 vs 36). GMS is private and headquartered in Baar, Switzerland; Telnyx is private and based in Chicago, USA.
Channels
Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| SMS | Yes | Yes |
| MMS | No | Yes |
| RCS | Yes | Yes |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Viber | Yes | No |
| Facebook Messenger | No | No |
| Telegram | No | No |
| Apple Messages for Business | No | No |
| Voice | No | Yes |
| Yes | Yes |
What's the differenceThey share 4 channels. GMS additionally offers Viber, while Telnyx additionally offers MMS, Voice.
Developer Experience
How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service onboarding | No | Yes |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
| Docs quality | med | high |
| Documentation | Open ↗ | Open ↗ |
| SDKs | iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin) | Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, Java, .NET, PHP |
| Sandbox / test env | No | No |
| API types | REST | REST, SMPP |
What's the differenceTelnyx offers Self-service onboarding, while GMS does not; on SDKs, GMS adds iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin); Telnyx adds Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, Java, .NET, PHP; on API types, Telnyx adds SMPP.
Data & Compliance
Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| EU data residency | Yes | Yes |
| US data residency | No | Yes |
| Choose region | No | Yes |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | Yes |
| HIPAA | No | Yes |
What's the differenceTelnyx offers US data residency, while GMS does not; Telnyx offers Choose region, while GMS does not; Telnyx offers SOC 2, while GMS does not; Telnyx offers HIPAA, while GMS does not.
Data Retention
How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Retention policy | Not publicly documented in detail. GMS's privacy notice states personal data is processed under EU GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and held at its Switzerland headquarters (recognized by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of data protection); no specific retention periods for message content or metadata are published. GMS also holds ISO/IEC 27701 (privacy information management) certification. | Telnyx follows a "Privacy by Design", minimal data-retention approach with customer-controlled retention policies, so message content and metadata retention can be configured by the customer. Its security-practices documentation states security logs are retained for 90 days; specific default retention periods for message content are not publicly documented in detail. |
What's the differenceGMS: Not publicly documented in detail. GMS's privacy notice states personal data is processed under EU GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and held at its Switzerland headquarters (recognized by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of data protection); no specific retention periods for message content or metadata are published. GMS also holds ISO/IEC 27701 (privacy information management) certification. Telnyx: Telnyx follows a "Privacy by Design", minimal data-retention approach with customer-controlled retention policies, so message content and metadata retention can be configured by the customer. Its security-practices documentation states security logs are retained for 90 days; specific default retention periods for message content are not publicly documented in detail.
Pricing & Credits
Pricing model and the cost of a first message.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise pricing negotiated with sales; no public self-service or per-message price list. | Pay-as-you-go per message billed per message part, with volume discounts and custom contracts for high-volume customers. |
| SMS starting price | Not published | $0.004 per outbound SMS message part (US, plus carrier fees) |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
What's the differenceGMS and Telnyx are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.
Reach & Reliability
Global coverage and delivery dependability.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| Countries covered | 0 | 130 |
| Direct operator connections | Yes | Yes |
| Published uptime SLA | 99.99% network availability (claimed; no formal SLA published) | 99.99% (SLA) |
What's the differenceTelnyx leads on Countries covered (130 vs 0 for GMS).
Company & Trust
Independent reviews and company profile.
| Field | GMS | Telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| G2 rating | 0.0 | 4.7 |
| G2 reviews | 0 | 525 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 201-500 |
What's the differenceTelnyx leads on G2 rating (4.7 vs 0 for GMS); Telnyx leads on G2 reviews (525 vs 0 for GMS).
Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides:
Already on one of them? Follow a migration guide: